Policy

Regarding Directors, in light of the broad and diverse nature of its businesses, the Company appoints, in a well-balanced manner, those who have broad knowledge, experience and qualification. Regarding Outside Directors, the Company appoints, from among such as management or experts of external entities, those who have knowledge and extensive expertise, that is difficult to be brought if it is relying only on Inside Directors. The Company, also, considering importance of independency of an appointee, appoints Outside Directors, from the perspective that there is no conflict of interest between the Company and the appointee, and that the appointee can increase and enhance the effectiveness of the oversight of the Board based on objective and neutral standpoint.

Regarding Audit & Supervisory Board (A&SB) Members, the Company appoints those who have knowledge, experience and qualification for exercising their responsibilities and duties. Also the Company appoints A&SB Member who has substantial finance, accounting and legal knowledge.

Regarding Outside A&SB Members, the Company appoints, from among such as management of external entities, lawyer and certified public accountant, those who have knowledge and extensive expertise, that is difficult to be brought if it is relying only on Inside A&SB Members. The Company, also, considering importance of independency of an appointee, appoints Outside A&SB Members, from the perspective that there is no conflict of interest between the Company and the appointee, and that the appointee may increase and enhance the effectiveness of the auditing by A&SB Members on the execution of business by Directors based on objective and neutral standpoint.

Knowledge expectations of directors and Audit & Supervisory Board members

In order for our Board of Directors to fulfill its roles, we have identified 9 (nine) areas of knowledge that the Board of Directors must possess, based on the premise that the directors are serious about social issues and have the enthusiasm and commitment to make changes that will enhance our corporate value.

(1) Portfolio management (hereinafter, “PFM”) and corporate value improvement
Knowledge of corporate regeneration through PFM at a conglomerate corporation, knowledge of turn-arounds for improving corporate value, and knowledge of measures for improving corporate value from the perspective of capital markets and active investors

(2) Global management
Knowledge of management at a global conglomerate corporation

(3) Use of AI and data
Experience with use of AI and data, and connecting DX (digital transformation) to value creation

(4) Future concepts, growth strategy
Knowledge that allows an understanding of long-term social changes, and conceptualization of how to position the Company amidst those changes in order to achieve growth

(5) Sustainability management
Experience for incorporating sustainability elements into management and linking them to improving corporate value

(6) Human capital management
Practical experience in human resources PFM coordinated with business strategies and investing human capital for maximizing personnel productivity

(7) Geopolitics, industrial policies
Deep understanding of the global political and economic situation and industrial policies, and experience in proposing and formulating policies

(8) Finance, investment decisions
Knowledge related to financial insights for achieving improved capital efficiency and experience with large-scale investment decisions

(9) Technologies, manufacturing, supply chain
Experience working to strengthen competitiveness and carrying out innovations based on knowledge related to technologies, production, quality, and other matters

Of the knowledge areas, the table below lists the top four areas where each director and Audit & Supervisory Board member is expected to demonstrate particular knowledge and skill.

As of June, 2025

Nomination of Executive Officers

Eligible Executive Officers include those responsible for the Group governance, important management agendas across the Group, and external affairs. Personnel with the knowledge, experience, and capabilities appropriate for these positions are appointed after deliberations by the Nomination Advisory Committee.

Procedure

With regard to candidates for Directors, Executive Officers, and A&SB Members, the Nomination Advisory Committee deliberates on the internal review results based on consultation from the Board of Directors, and reports its findings back to the Board. The Board of Directors then makes the final decision based on the committee’s report. For candidates for A&SB Members, the consent of the A&SB is obtained prior to the resolution by the Board of Directors.

Dismissal of Directors and Executive Officers

With respect to the dismissal of Directors, if a Director remarkably lacks in qualification as a Director because of violation of laws and regulations, involvement in unfair, dishonest or suspicious acts undermining confidence as a Director, or a decline in business or for other reasons, as set forth in the Rules for Directors, the proposal of dismissal to the General Meeting of shareholders, exclusion of such director from the candidates for the next director, and other necessary actions are resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Rules for Directors. Regarding dismissal of Executive Officers, if an Executive Officer remarkably lacks in qualification as an Executive Officer because of violation of laws and regulations, involvement in unfair, dishonest or suspicious acts undermining confidence as an Executive Officer, or a decline in business of for other reasons, as set forth in the Rules for Executive Officers, the Board of Directors shall resolve the necessary actions. The members of the Nomination Advisory Committee may propose the timing for replacement of the Group CEO.

Overview of the Independence Standards for Outside Directors/ Audit &Supervisory Board Members

The following persons are not considered independent.

(1) A person executing the operations of a parent company or a subsidiary of the parent company of the Company (Including a person who corresponds to such a person recently or previously, hereinafter, “executing person”)

(2) A person whose major business partner is the Panasonic Group or an executing person of the same, or a major business partner of the Panasonic Group or an executing person of the same.

(3) A consultant, accounting expert, or legal expert who receives a significant amount of money or other property from the Panasonic Group other than compensation as a Director / Audit & Supervisory Board Member. If the person who receives such property is an organization such as a legal entity or association, a person who belongs or belonged to the organization corresponds to the relevant person.

(4) A principal shareholder of the Company (If the principal shareholder is a legal entity, an executing person of such legal entity)

(5) A close relative listed in items (1) to (4) (A second-degree or closer relative applies. The same applies hereinafter.) or a close relative of an executing person of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company (If an Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member is appointed to as an Independent Director / Audit & Supervisory Board Member, a person who is or who was a non-executing director / accounting advisor is included in the executing person.)

(Notes)

i) In the items (1), (2), (4) and (5) above, an “executing person” corresponds to any of the following.

  • An executive director, an executive officer (shikkouyaku) or a director / audit & supervisory board member who executes business of a legal entity, etc.
  • An employee who executes business, a person responsible of serving duties of an employee who executes business of a legal entity in the case that the legal entity is an employee who executes business, or other such equivalent person
  • A worker Also, the wording “recently” shall be assumed to be the point of time when the content of the bill of the general meeting of shareholders electing the person as a director or an audit & supervisory board member is decided, and the wording “previously” shall be assumed to be within the last three years.

ii) In the item (2) above, “major” shall be applied to the case in which the amount of the transaction between the Panasonic Group and a business partner exceeds 2% of either of their annual consolidated net sales.

iii) In the item (3) above, “a significant amount” shall be applied to the case in which the person oneself who provides a service (individual) or the organization such as a corporation or association to which a service provider belongs, in providing a service to the Panasonic Group, corresponds to any of the following.

“A person who belongs or belonged” includes not only a partner, but also an associate as it is so called.

  • A person oneself who provides a service: Receives compensation of more than or equal to 12 million yen per year from the Panasonic Group.
  • An organization to which a service provider belongs: The amount of the transaction between the Panasonic Group and the organization exceeds 2% of either of their annual consolidated net sales. “A person who belonged to an organization” shall be assumed to be identified based on whether the person belonged to the organization within the last three years.

iv) In the item (4) above, “a principal shareholder” shall mean a shareholder holding 10% or more of the voting rights of the Company.

v) In the item (5) above, “A person who was a non-executive director / accounting advisor” shall be assumed to be identified based on whether the person was in the position within the last three years.