The Panasonic Group operates with the purpose of consistently fulfilling its business objective of contributing to the development of society in all corporate activities, in accordance with the management philosophy established by its founder, Konosuke Matsushita.

Policy

The founder continuously urged each employee to sharpen his or her sensitivity to change, stating that "there are signs before all things" and that "one must be alert to signs of change and act accordingly." The Group’s risk management is an initiative aimed at maximizing the organization’s fulfillment of its mission as a "public entity of society" by valuing this sensitivity at every level, from the front lines to management, and by seeking to prevent in advance adverse impacts on the achievement of its business objectives while proactively utilizing favorable impacts.

Diagram illustrating the positioning of risk management. At the top is “Purpose of Our Business,” with “Contribution to the Development of Society” shown as its content. Below this is “Our Stakeholders,” followed by five stakeholder categories arranged horizontally from left to right: “Local Communities,” “Business Partners,” “Employees,” “Customers,” and “Shareholders.” A large circle is positioned in the center. To the upper left of the circle is “Changes in the Business Environment.” Inside the large circle is a clockwise circular arrow labeled “Risk Management.” Within that ring is another clockwise circular arrow, labeled “Business Strategy” at the top and “Business Operation” at the bottom. At the center is a circle labeled “Risk Culture.” Below the large circle is “Practice of the Basic Business Philosophy of the Panasonic Group,” surrounded by a large circular arrow.

Panasonic Group values a Risk Culture in terms of its organizational awareness and behavior toward risk, aiming to enhance its risk management effectiveness (see “Education and Awareness” below). We aim to build on this cultural orientation to ensure that we adequately incorporate responses to changes in the business environment into our strategies and operations.

Responsible Executive and Framework

The Group has established a Groupwide risk management system and processes based on the “Panasonic Group Basic Rules for Risk Management” (the “Basic Rules”), which comply with ISO 31000, an international standard for risk management systems, and COSO-ERM (2017), an international framework for risk management.

The Group operates in a broad range of business areas in Japan and overseas, including Connect, Electric Works, HVAC & CC, Energy, Industry, and Smart Life etc. In light of this business structure, and in order to achieve risk management that balances optimization at both the corporate and business levels, the Group has established promotion systems at Panasonic Holdings Corporation (“PHD”), as the holding company, and at each operating company based on the "Basic Rules."

At PHD, the PHD Enterprise Risk Management Committee ("PHD ERM Committee") has been established, with the Group Chief Risk Management Officer ("Group CRO"), who is responsible for promoting the Group’s risk management, serving as chairperson, and the heads of the functional divisions responsible for Group measures serving as members. In addition, the Enterprise Risk Management Office ("PHD ERM Office") and the functional divisions work together to carry out the practical operations for promoting risk management.

Diagram illustrating the Risk Management Framework. The diagram consists of two large sections: "Panasonic Holdings Corp." in the upper half and "Operating Company" in the lower half. Within the Panasonic Holdings Corp. section, "Shareholder’s Meeting" is positioned at the top left, with "PHD Board of Directors" directly below it. A downward arrow extends from "Shareholder’s Meeting" to "PHD Board of Directors". Below and to the left of "PHD Board of Directors" is "Group Transformation Round Table (GTRT)", and at the same level on the right is the oval-shaped "Group CEO". A left-pointing arrow extends from "Group CEO" to "Group Transformation Round Table (GTRT)". Further below is the light blue horizontal rectangle labeled "PHD ERM Committee". A dark blue oval labeled "Group CRO" is positioned on the left side, partially overlapping the "PHD ERM Committee". Upward arrows extend from the "PHD ERM Committee" and connect to both "Group Transformation Round Table (GTRT)" and "PHD Board of Directors". Below the "PHD ERM Committee", a dark blue box labeled "PHD Function (HR, Legal, Accounting /Finance etc)" is located on the left, and a light blue box labeled "PHD ERM Office" is located on the right. A left-pointing arrow extends from "PHD ERM Office" to "PHD Function", and an upward arrow extends from "PHD ERM Office" to "PHD ERM Committee". On the right side of the Panasonic Holdings Corp. section, at the same height as "PHD Board of Directors", is a gray box labeled "PHD Audit & Supervisory Board". A left-pointing arrow extends from "PHD Audit & Supervisory Board" to "PHD Board of Directors". Below it is a gray box labeled "Internal Audit Committee (Group CFO/Group GC)", connected to "Group CEO" by a bidirectional arrow. An upward arrow extends from "Internal Audit Committee" to "PHD Audit & Supervisory Board". Further below is a gray box labeled "Internal Audit Department (Internal control, Internal audit, Compliance audit)". A bidirectional arrow connects "PHD ERM Office" and "Internal Audit Department". An upward arrow extends from "Internal Audit Department" to "Internal Audit Committee (Group CFO/Group GC)", and a left-pointing arrow extends from "Internal Audit Department" to "PHD Function". Within the Operating Company section, "Operating Company Board of Directors" is positioned at the upper left, with "Operating Company ERM Committee /Management Meeting, etc." directly below it. An upward arrow extends from "Operating Company ERM Committee /Management Meeting, etc." to "Operating Company Board of Directors". Below these, a dark blue "Function" box is located on the left, a white "Business Division" box below it, and a white "Domestic/Overseas Subsidiaries" box at the bottom. On the right is a light blue "ERM Function" box. An upward arrow extends from "ERM Function" to "Operating Company ERM Committee /Management Meeting, etc.". Left-pointing arrows extend from "ERM Function" to both "Function" and "Business Division". A downward arrow extends from "Business Division" to "Domestic/Overseas Subsidiaries". On the right side of the Operating Company section is a gray "Internal Audit Department" box positioned at the same level as "ERM Function". A bidirectional arrow connects "ERM Function" and "Internal Audit Department". The "PHD Function" and "Function" boxes are connected by vertical arrows labeled "Collaboration among risk owners". The "PHD ERM Office" and "ERM Function" boxes are connected by vertical arrows labeled "Alignment of risk control". The "Internal Audit Department" on the Panasonic Holdings side and the "Internal Audit Department" on the Operating Company side are connected by vertical arrows labeled "Alignment of risk assurance". On the far left side of the diagram are two vertical bands. The upper band is labeled "Group/PHD High-Priority Risks", and the lower band is labeled "Operating Company High-Priority Risks". A note at the bottom of the diagram states: "PHD: Panasonic Holdings Corp." and "ERM: Enterprise Risk Management."

Basic Framework

At PHD, once a year, risks requiring a response or monitoring by PHD or the Group, as well as their priorities, are identified, analyzed and assessed from top-down, bottom-up and cross-functional perspectives, based on changes in the external and internal environment and management’s recognition of risks in light of the Group’s management policies and plans. The Group endeavors to anticipate an uncertain future and effectively allocate limited management resources by taking into account not only the degree of impact on the Group and its stakeholders, including employees, customers and business partners, but also multiple indicators such as vulnerability to such risks.

In addition, at PHD, the PHD ERM Committee conducts regular risk reviews, including monitoring changes in risks and the status of measures to address high-priority risks. The content related to this series of initiatives for promoting risk management is utilized not only to enhance the quality of management decision-making and business execution at Group Transformation Round Table (GTRT) and to support the Board of Directors in supervising the effectiveness and efficiency of the risk management system, but also in risk-based internal audits focused on high-priority risks.

In recent years, given the growing importance of addressing social demands such as corporate social responsibility (CSR), the SDGs, and ESG, these activities have also incorporated risks factors arising from failure to meet such expectations, including those related to human rights, labor compliance, and environmental issues. They also incorporate evaluation factors related to the impacts of our business activities on stakeholders.

▪Recognized high-priority risks (the Group/PHD)

The high-priority risks recognized by the Group as of July 2026 are as follows. For details, please refer to “Risk Factors” in the Annual Securities Report.

* high-priority risks identified through the PHD ERM framework

Purpose

Risk (Opportunity/Threat)

Strengthening the Trust Foundation of the Solutions Business as a Driver of Growth

Information security and cyber security*

Use of AI (Artificial Intelligence)*

Continuous Promotion of Business Portfolio Management

Risks related to competition and the industry

Risks related to alliances with other companies, corporate acquisitions, etc.*

Risks related to business restructuring

Establishing Global Safety and Compliance Frameworks

Compliance and legal regulations

Human rights and labor compliance*

Quality*

Occupational accidents*

Risks related to intellectual property

Strengthening Resilience in a Highly Uncertain Environment

Risks related to international business operations*

Environmental issues/climate change

Disasters, accidents, and unpredictable events*

Talent attraction, acquisition, and retention

Risks related to supply chain

Changing economic conditions

Trends in currency exchange rate, interest rates, and the stock market

Accounting estimates

Education & Awareness

In order to enhance the effectiveness of risk management, the Group is promoting initiatives aimed at fostering a "Risk Culture" so that each employee can continuously improve his or her risk literacy and pursue sound risk-taking in an ever-changing environment. In Japan, through training for employees upon joining the Group and prior to overseas assignments, the Group aims to help them acquire the mindset necessary to avoid being excessively fearful of risks and to turn them into opportunities for organizational and personal growth, as well as a basic understanding of how to respond in the event of a crisis.

As part of our corporate social responsibility, we conduct external lectures titled “Risk Management that Supports Organizational and Individual Growth” at universities to help develop the young people who will lead the future through risk management.

Whistleblowing Channel (Internal and External)

The Group maintains the “Global Hotline EARS” to allow Group sites in Japan and overseas and business partners to report potential risks, including compliance violations, diverse types of harassment, and issues related to procurement activities. For more details, see “Whistleblowing System” in the “Ethics and Compliance” chapter.

BCM • BCP

The Group is committed to enhancing operational resilience through business continuity management (BCM) activities to ensure business continuity in the event of crises such as natural disasters, terrorism, war, pandemics, and cyberattacks.

We have established basic policies, organizational structures, roles, and initial response measures for emergencies that could significantly impact the entire Group, as outlined in the “Panasonic Group Emergency Management Rules”. We also conduct annual Group disaster drills and work to strengthen disaster prevention and mitigation measures in normal times, thereby bolstering the effectiveness of emergency response systems and coordination based on these regulations.

Moreover, we implement risk-based measures at the Group and in our supply chain based on hazard studies of natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods, and tsunamis). We have also conducted impact analyses using the Nankai Trough Earthquake and the Tokyo Inland Earthquake as stress events with high likelihood, assuming these natural disasters will have a particularly severe impact on the Group’s business. We are improving measures deemed necessary based on the analysis results.

Finally, the Group is working to continuously enhance the entire Group’s resilience by applying the Guidelines for Building Business Continuity Management (BCM). These guidelines outline the approach to identifying priority businesses for recovery in the event of an emergency and establishing business recovery processes. We also encourage each operating company and business site to formulate and appropriately revise their business continuity plans (BCPs).